Saturday, October 15, 2011

WHO ICF system of disability classification




Not to many practicing assessment professionals are familiar with the World Health Organizations International Health Classification system, a system with some good concepts related to disability Dx and disability functional issues. The following article presents a nice overcview (double click on images to enlarge)





- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

American Behavioral Scientist study suggests Twitter can foster sense of personal communities

This is a bit off-topic for my blogs, but I am a user of various social media, primarily for professional purposes. But, others use social media like Twitter to form personal social networks....and now, one study suggests it can help provide a form of sense of a personal community. Double click on images to enlarge







- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Generated by: Tag Generator


Monday, September 26, 2011

Personal Recommended Reading: The Fifth Agreement - Toltec Wisdom




I read this simple book a while back and return to it frequently when I find the need for a little personal perspective on things. The five agreements make eminent sense for a more real and sane approach to living. Although not written from research in cognitive psychology, one can relate the five agreements to some solid research on cognitive thinking and cognitive restructuring of thoughts. I have now made a "five agreements" cheat sheet that is the wallpaper on my iPad screen---so I am reminded of the five concepts constantly. I am skimming the book again.



- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Dissertation Dish: Can pitch or rhythm (Ga-auditory processing) training improve phonological awareness (Ga)




The effectiveness of Separate Pitch and Rhythm Training Interventions on the Phonological Awareness of Kindergarten Learners by Richards, Susannah Converse, Ed.D., Northcentral University, 2011 , 171 pages; AAT 3472255

Abstract

Although neuroscientists assert that music training impacts neural development, previous research has not teased apart which components of music possibly enhance language literacy in emergent readers. The purpose of this quantitative research study was to establish if immersion in pitch activities as compared with rhythm activities could cause the significant development of initial sound (IS) skills, letter sounds (LS) skills, and sound pattern skills in kindergarten readers. This study examined the effectiveness of supplemental music instruction on the phonological awareness skills of kindergarten learners ( N = 38) who originated from seven classrooms in one suburban elementary school. Leveled subjects randomly were assigned to an experimental pitch group ( n = 12), or an experimental rhythm group ( n = 11), or a control group ( n = 15). During sixteen 40-minute sessions that spanned eight weeks, pitch group subjects explored the highness and lowness of sound, while rhythm group subjects investigated the duration of sound. The control group engaged in 20-minute weekly read-aloud sessions. Pre- and post-test data collection consisted of the kindergarten version of the Test of Phonological Awareness - Second Edition: Plus , and the sound patterns music subtest of the Woodcock Johnson III . Data was converted to Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for analysis. Separate 3 x 3 factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) revealed the levels differed on each of the IS variables (pitch [ F =7.74; df = 3], rhythm [ F = .07; df = 3], control [ F = .18; df = 2]); and the LS variables (low pitch [ F = 1.0; df = 3], low rhythm [ F = 6.62; df = 3], low control [ F = 4.0; df = 2]). Significance was observed with a matched-pairs t -test with the low pitch treatment group ( t [3] = 0.034, p < 0.04). Future research should recruit a larger sample and utilize a different music assessment. This study provides insight into a real-world application relative to specific components of music that potentially enhance the phonological awareness of the most challenged of kindergarten readers before remediation is necessary.



- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Mad Box reaction time app: Possible brain fitness tool?

An interesting reaction time app for the iPhone/iPad. It has the appearance of a possible brain fitness tool......would be nice someone would do some research on this to see if it does improve any aspects of cognitive functioning

Double click on image to enlarge. Visit link about to visit developers website




- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Monday, September 19, 2011

The IQ Brain Clock: More research linking mental timing and intelligence




The link between mental time-keeping and intelligence continues to emerge in research across a variety of disciplines. Here is another new study. This study is posted via the IQs Reading blog feature---see article for comments and links to additional research

Tic toc...........

Double click on image to enlarge


- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Generated by: Tag Generator




Human functioning covers at least 10 levels of " timing"--but the most critical is at the milli- and micro-second level

Human temporal processing covers approximately 10 levels of magnitude, but it is the finest levels of mental timing where "the action is" in terms of cognitive and motor learning and performance---the focus of this blog. I love this big picture figure.

Double click on images to enlarge





- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Friday, September 16, 2011

IM-HOME launched: Interactive Metronome-Home mental-timing based intervention

Today Interactive Metronome, a brain clock (mental time-keeping) based neurotech intervention, launched a new "home" product web page called IM-HOME. Click here to visit.

(Double click on image to enlarge)


As most readers of this blog know, IM is the reason I started the IQ Brain Clock blog. I have disclosed my conflict of interest (on the IM Scientific Advisory board) in most all of my prior IM-related posts.

I will add the IM-Home Blog feed to the "IQ Brain Clock & Rhythm "Times" e-paper once they get an RSS feed for the blog

- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Thursday, September 15, 2011

The four models of the IQ Brain Clock (mental time-keeping)




There are four four primary models advanced to explain mental time-keeping. I was reminded of this when I revisited a prior post that summarized an excellent article published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Click here to review this post.


- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Brain rhythm efficacy research: Can we fine-tune our brain?




It was recently brought to my attention that the link to a previously posted report I produced with Amy Vega (from Interactive Metronome) was dead. Earthlink (my server host) had informed me I was over quota...so I started some mass file deletion. This report was a victim of the purge. As I skimmed the report I realized that it is still a nice synthesis of the efficacy of a general class of research on brain rhythm training interventions. Below was our general conclusion. I would recommend that people who have not read the report revisit that post (with the fixed link) to understand why I continue to be intrigued by brain timing research and the potential for brain timing based interventions.

General conclusion:

...given the converging research that points toward a possible neurologically-based domain-general internal mental-timing mechanism (i.e., a potentially modifiable internal brain clock), it is possible that the efficacy of all four classes of rhythm-based treatments are operating (in their own way) on “fine tuning the temporal resolution of the human brain clock.” Our temporal resolution fine-tuning hypothesis is consistent with the temporal resolution power (TRP) hypothesis (Rammsayer & Brandler, 2002, 2007) that indicates that oscillatory brain process are responsible for the efficiency and speed of neural-based information processing. We hypothesize, via the temporal resolution fine-tuning hypothesis, that the positive outcomes for rhythm perception and production based treatments may be due to these treatments increasing the efficiency and speed of information processing in brain-based neural networks responsible for the planning, execution and synchronization of complex human behaviors.

We urge both academic and applied researchers to embrace the temporal processing (mental timing) theory--diagnostic/classification--treatment literature reviewed in this report and increase efforts to understand the links between the three legs of the mental timing stool. The positive effects of current “brain rhythm” treatment programs for many types of disorders, across a variety of human performance domains, is encouraging, particularly when placed in the context of the emerging science and theory of the human brain clock.



- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Generated by: Tag Generator






- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Test post--ignore




- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Friday, August 19, 2011

One of the best texts on intellectual assessment has been revised: Flanagan & Harrison's Contemporary Intellectual Assessment

Just in time for your XMAS shopping!!!! One of the best texts on intellectual assessment and theories related to the practice of intellectual assessment.

The publisher has given me permission to post this information. The text below does not show all the formatting in the original document sent to me, so if you want a nicer PDF version to share with others, click here.


Conflict of interest disclosure: I have coauthored a chapter in the book and will be splitting an honorarium check (not big, trust me) and will be receiving a free copy. But, I get no royalties (I wish I did).


Kudos to Dr. Flanagan and Harrison for revising what I consider one of the best texts on intellectual assessment.




NEW FROM THE GUILFORD PRESS (​Revised and Expanded!)

Contemporary Intellectual Assessment, Third Edition
Theories, Tests, and Issues
Edited by Dawn P. Flanagan, PhD, Department of Psychology, St. John's University; and
Patti L. Harrison, PhD, Department of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, and Counseling, University of Alabama

Available to Ship: December 2011
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 926
Size: 7" x 10"
Hardcover: ISBN 978-1-60918-995-2
Hardcover Price: $95.00 tentative/short discount
Prior edition copyright: 2005
Prior edition cloth ISBN: 978-1-59385-125-5
Website Category: EDUCATION: Educational Psychology; School Psychology. PSYCHOLOGY: School Psychology; Neuropsychology & Neuroscience; Child/Adolescent Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry.
Subject Areas/Keywords: adults, assessment instruments, batteries, children, cognitive assessments, developmental, educational psychology, evaluations, intellectual assessments, intellectual disabilities, intelligence testing, learning disabilities, response to intervention, RTI, tests
Internal Code: F
Date Issued: August 15, 2011

CRITICAL ACCLAIM
"This is the most comprehensive, authoritative, and up-to-date text on intellectual assessment available. It covers current theories of intelligence, methods of intelligence testing, and their applications to special populations. The chapters are all written by leading scholars and combine clear research summaries with practical advice, making this a valuable book for graduate students and professionals interested in both research and practice."—Paul J. Frick, PhD, University Distinguished Professor and Chair, Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans

"A single source for essential, detailed information on the past, present, and future of intellectual and cognitive assessment practices. The table of contents provides an objective sweep of all major theories, tests, and evaluation procedures at a glance; the expertise of the chapter authors results in a work that is consistently outstanding. The third edition reflects the latest efforts in clinical inquiry that explore cognitive abilities and processes as they relate to the real world. It emphasizes cross-cultural issues in assessment and incorporates new approaches and instruments related to learning and developmental problems. This is an essential text for graduate-level assessment courses."
—Elaine Fletcher-Janzen, EdD, Department of School Psychology, Chicago School of Professional Psychology

"This updated volume is a valuable addition to the field of intellectual and psychological assessment. The editors have assembled the leaders in the field to present the most up-to-date information available. Many of the chapters are written by the test authors and theory creators themselves; readers will benefit from the firsthand approach to test and theory interpretation. The book is written in a way that will appeal to both experienced practitioners and graduate students just starting out in the field."—Andrew S. Davis, PhD, Department of Educational Psychology, Ball State University

"A superb theoretical and clinical overview....The standards of theoretical and methodological rigor, comprehensive topical coverage, balanced and objective critical analysis, life span cognitive evaluation, and advocacy for special populations...are beautifully balanced. One could not ask for more from a review and critical evaluation of this extensive, rich, and complex literature."—PsycCRITIQUES

"Should be required reading in all intelligence testing courses and by anyone involved in the assessment of human and cognitive abilities."—Psychotherapy in Private Practice

DESCRIPTION
In one volume, this authoritative reference presents a current, comprehensive overview of intellectual and cognitive assessment, with a focus on practical applications. Leaders in the field describe major theories of intelligence and provide the knowledge needed to use the latest measures of cognitive abilities with individuals of all ages, from toddlers to adults. Evidence-based approaches to test interpretation, and their relevance for intervention, are described. The book addresses critical issues in assessing particular populations—including culturally and linguistically diverse students, gifted students, and those with learning difficulties and disabilities—in today's educational settings.

New to This Edition
*Incorporates major research advances and legislative and policy changes.
*Covers recent test revisions plus additional tests: the NEPSY-II and the WNV.
*Expanded coverage of specific populations: chapters on autism spectrum disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, sensory and physical disabilities and traumatic brain injury, and intellectual disabilities.
*Chapters on neuropsychological approaches, assessment of executive functions, and multi-tiered service delivery models in schools.

KEY POINTS
> An authoritative reference, revised and expanded: features 11 new chapters.
> Comprehensive and current: covers all major tests and how they relate to educational services and policy.
> Chapters are written by the test developers themselves.
> A successful practitioner handbook and graduate-level text.

AUDIENCE
Practitioners, students, and researchers in school, educational, cognitive, and child clinical psychology.

COURSE USE
Serves as a primary text in graduate-level intellectual/cognitive assessment courses.

CONTENTS
I. The Origins of Intellectual Assessment
1. A History of Intelligence Assessment: The Unfinished Tapestry, John D. Wasserman
2. A History of Intelligence Test Interpretation, Randy W. Kamphaus, Anne Pierce Winsor, Ellen W. Rowe, and Sangwon Kim
II. Contemporary Theoretical Perspectives
3. Foundations for Better Understanding of Cognitive Abilities, John L. Horn and Nayena Blankson
4. The Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) Model of Intelligence, W. Joel Schneider and Kevin S. McGrew
5. Assessment of Intellectual Profile: A Perspective from Multiple-Intelligences Theory, Jie-Qi Chen and Howard Gardner
6. The Triarchic Theory of Successful Intelligence, Robert J. Sternberg
7. Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, Successive (PASS): A Cognitive Processing–Based Theory of Intelligence, Jack A. Naglieri, J. P. Das, and Sam Goldstein
III. Contemporary Intelligence, Cognitive, and Neuropsychological Batteries (and Associated Achievement Tests)
8. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) and the Wechsler Memory Scale–Fourth Edition (WMS-IV), Lisa Whipple Drozdick, Dustin Wahlstrom, Jianjun Zhu, and Lawrence G. Weiss
9. The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence–Third Edition (WPPSI–III), the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition (WISC–IV), and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–Third Edition (WIAT–III), Dustin Wahlstrom, Kristina C. Breaux, Jianjun Zhu, and Lawrence G. Weiss
10. The Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB5), Gale H. Roid and Mark Pomplun
11. The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children–Second Edition (KABC-II) and the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement–Second Edition (KTEA-II), Jennie Kaufman Singer, Elizabeth O. Lichtenberger, James C. Kaufman, Alan S. Kaufman, and Nadeen L. Kaufman
12. The Woodcock–Johnson III Normative Update (WJ III NU): Tests of Cognitive Abilities and Tests of Achievement, Fredrick A. Schrank and Barbara J. Wendling
13. The Differential Ability Scales–Second Edition (DAS-II), Colin D. Elliott
14. The Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (UNIT): A Multidimensional Nonverbal Alternative for Cognitive Assessment, R. Steve McCallum and Bruce A. Bracken
15. The Cognitive Assessment System (CAS): From Theory to Practice, Jack A. Naglieri and Tulio M. Otero
16. The Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) and the Reynolds Intellectual Screening Test (RIST), Cecil R. Reynolds, Randy W. Kamphaus, and Tara C. Raines
17. The NEPSY-II, Robb N. Matthews, Cynthia A. Riccio, and John L. Davis
18. The Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability (WNV): Assessment of Diverse Populations, Jack A. Naglieri and Tulio M. Otero
IV. Contemporary Interpretive Approaches and Their Relevance for Intervention
19. The Cross-Battery Assessment (XBA) Approach: An Overview, Historical Perspective, and Current Directions, Dawn P. Flanagan, Vincent C. Alfonso, and Samuel O. Ortiz
20. Cognitive Hypothesis Testing (CHT): Linking Test Results to the Real World, Catherine A. Fiorello, James B. Hale, and Kirby L. Wycoff
21. Processing Approaches to Interpreting Information from Cognitive Ability Tests: A Critical Review, Randy G. Floyd and John H. Kranzler
22. Testing with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations: Moving beyond the Verbal–Performance Dichotomy into Evidence-Based Practice, Samuel O. Ortiz, Salvador Hector Ochoa, and Agnieszka M. Dynda
23. Linking Cognitive Abilities to Academic Interventions for Students with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD), Nancy Mather and Barbara J. Wendling
V. Assessment of Intelligence and Cognitive Functioning in Different Populations
24. Cognitive Assessment in Early Childhood: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, Laurie Ford, Michelle L. Kozey, and Juliana Negreiros
25. Use of Intelligence Tests in the Identification of Giftedness, David E. McIntosh, Felicia A. Dixon, and Eric E. Pierson
26. Use of Ability Tests in the Identification of Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) within the Context of an Operational Definition, Dawn P. Flanagan, Vincent C. Alfonso, Jennifer T. Mascolo, and Marlene Sotelo-Dynega
27. Assessment of Intellectual Functioning in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Laura Grofer Klinger, Sarah E. O’Kelley, Joanna L. Mussey, Sam Goldstein, and Melissa DeVries
28. Cognitive and Neuropsychological Assessment of ADHD: Redefining a Disruptive Behavior Disorder, James B. Hale, Megan Yim, Andrea N. Schneider, Gabrielle Wilcox, Julie N. Henzel, and Shauna G. Dixon
29. Intellectual and Neuropsychological Assessment of Individuals with Sensory and Physical Disabilities and Traumatic Brain Injury, Scott L. Decker, Julia A. Englund, and Alycia M. Roberts
30. Use of Intelligence Tests in the Identification of Children with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD), Kathleen Armstrong, Jason Hangauer, and Joshua Nadeau
VI. Contemporary and Emerging Issues in Intellectual Assessment
31. Using Joint Test Standards to Evaluate the Validity Evidence for Intelligence Tests, Jeffery P. Braden and Bradley C. Niebling
32. Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to Aid in Understanding the Constructs Measured by Intelligence Tests, Timothy Z. Keith and Matthew R. Reynolds
33: The Emergence of Neuropsychological Constructs into Tests of Intelligence and Cognitive Abilities, Daniel C. Miller and Denise E. Maricle
34. The Role of Cognitive and Intelligence Tests in the Assessment of Executive Functions, Denise E. Maricle and Erin Avirett
35. Intelligence Tests in the Context of Emerging Assessment Practices: Problem-Solving Applications, Rachel Brown-Chidsey and Kristina J. Andren
36. Intellectual, Cognitive, and Neuropsychological Assessment in Three-Tier Service Delivery Practices in Schools, George McCloskey, James Whitaker, Ryan Murphy, and Jane Rogers
Appendix. The Three-Stratum Theory of Cognitive Abilities, John B. Carroll

CONTRIBUTORS
Dynda Agnieszka, PsyD, Department of Psychology, St. John’s University, Jamaica, New York
Vincent C. Alfonso, PhD, Graduate School of Education, Fordham University, New York, New York
Kristina J. Andren, PsyD, School Psychology Program, University of Southern Maine, Gorham, Maine
Kathleen Armstrong, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
Erin Avirett, BA, Department of Psychology and Philosophy, Texas Women’s University, Denton, Texas
Nayena Blankson, PhD, Department of Psychology, Spelman College, Atlanta, Georgia
Bruce A. Bracken, PhD, School of Education, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia
Jeffery P. Braden, PhD, Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
Kristina C. Breaux, PhD, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, Texas
Rachel Brown-Chidsey, PhD, School Psychology Program, University of Southern Maine, Gorham, Maine
John B. Carroll, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Jie-Qi Chen, PhD, Erikson Institute, Chicago, Illinois
J. P. Das, PhD, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
John L. Davis, MA, Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Scott L. Decker, PhD, Department of Psychology, Barnwell College, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
Melissa DeVries, PhD, Neurology, Learning, and Behavior Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
Felicia A. Dixon, PhD, Department of Educational Psychology, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana
Shauna G. Dixon, MS, Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Lisa Whipple Drozdick, PhD, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, Texas
Agnieszka M. Dynda, PsyD, Department of Psychology, St. John’s University, Jamaica, New York
Colin D. Elliot, PhD, The Gervitz School of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara, California
Julia A. Englund, BA, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
Catherine A. Fiorello, PhD, NCSP, School Psychology Program and Department of Psychological Studies in Education, College of Education, Temple University, Philadelphia, Philadelphia
Dawn P. Flanagan, PhD, Department of Psychology, St. John’s University, Jamaica, New York
Randy G. Floyd, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
Laurie Ford, PhD, Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Howard Gardner, PhD, Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Sam Goldstein, PhD, Neurology, Learning, and Behavior Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
James B. Hale, PhD, School Psychology Program, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Philadelphia
Jason Hangauer, EdS, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
Julie N. Henzel, PsyD, The Nisonger Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
John L. Horn, PhD (deceased), Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
Randy W. Kamphaus, PhD, College of Education, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
Alan S. Kaufman, PhD, Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
James C. Kaufman, PhD, Department of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino, California
Nadeen L. Kaufman, PhD, Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
Timothy Z. Keith, PhD, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
Sangwon Kim, PhD, Graduate School of Education, Fordham University, New York, New York
Laura Grofer Klinger, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Michelle L. Kozey, MA, Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
John H. Kranzler, PhD, Special Education Program, College of Education, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Elizabeth O. Lichtenberger, PhD, private practice, Carlsbad, California
Denise E. Maricle, PhD, Department of Psychology and Philosophy, Texas Women’s University, Denton, Texas
Jennifer T. Mascolo, PsyD, Department of Psychology, St. John’s University, Jamaica, New York
Nancy Mather, PhD, Department of Disability and Psychoeducational Studies, College of Education, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Robb N. Matthews, MA, Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
R. Steve McCallum, PhD, Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
George McCloskey, PhD, Department of Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Kevin S. McGrew, PhD, Institute for Applied Psychometrics, St. Cloud, Minnesota
David E. McIntosh, PhD, Department of Educational Psychology, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana
Daniel C. Miller, PhD, Department of Psychology and Philosophy, Texas Women’s University, Denton, Texas
Ryan Murphy, EdS, Department of School Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Joanna L. Mussey, MA, Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Joshua Nadeau, MS, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
Jack A. Naglieri, PhD, ABAP, Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Juliana Negreiros, MA, Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Bradley C. Niebling, PhD, Midwest Instructional Leadership Council, Urbandale, Iowa
Salvador Hector Ochoa, PhD, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas–Pan American, Edinburg, Texas
Sarah E. O’Kelly, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Samuel O. Ortiz, PhD, Department of Psychology, St. John’s University, Jamaica, New York
Tulio M. Otero, PhD, School Psychology Program, Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Chicago, Illinois
Eric E. Pierson, PhD, NCSP, HSPP, Department of Educational Psychology, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana
Mark Pomplun, PhD, Riverside Publishing, Itasca, Illinois
Tara C. Raines, PsyS, Gwinnett County Public Schools, Gwinnett County, Georgia
Cecil R. Reynolds, PhD, Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Matthew R. Reynolds, PhD, Department of Psychology and Research in Education, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas
Cynthia A. Riccio, PhD, Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Alycia M. Roberts, BA, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
Jane Rogers, PsyD, Department of Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Gale H. Roid, PhD, Department of Institutional Research, Warner Pacific College, Portland, Oregon
Ellen W. Rowe, PhD, Center for Psychological Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Andrea N. Schneider, BA, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
W. Joel Schneider, PhD, Department of Psychology, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois
Fredrick A. Schrank, PhD, Woodcock–Munoz Foundation, Olympia, Washington
Jennie Kaufman Singer, PhD, College of Health and Human Services, Sacramento State University, Sacramento, California
Marlene Sotelo-Dynega, PhD, Department of Psychology, St. John’s University, Jamaica, New York
Robert J. Sternberg, PhD, Provost, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
Dustin Wahlstrom, PhD, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, Texas
John D. Wasserman, PhD, Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Lawrence G. Weiss, PhD, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, Texas
Barbara J. Wendling, MA, Consulting Services, Dallas, Texas
James Whitaker, PsyD, Department of Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Gabrielle Wilcox, PsyD, Department of School Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Anne Pierce Winsor, PhD, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Kirby L. Wycoff, EdM, NCSP, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey
Megan Yim, BA, Department of Psychology, Victoria Island University, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Jianjun Zhu, PhD, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, Texas

GUILFORD PUBLICATIONS, INC.
72 Spring Street, New York, NY 10012
Tel: (212) 431-9800​Toll Free: (800) 365-7006
Fax: (212) 966-6708​E-mail: info@guilford.com
Visit our website: www.guilford.com


- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad


Generated by: Tag Generator

Sunday, July 31, 2011

On the road again..blogging lite..or not at all

Leave for APA in DC on Tuesday and return Sunday. Will be blogging lite or not at all. I shall return



- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Sunday, July 03, 2011

More evidence for brain network involved in controlled attention

A broken theme at the IQ Brain Clock is the hypothesis that the prefrontal cortex(especially the dorsolateral prefrontal), left parietal cortex , cerebellum, and basal ganglia network is key to mental timing, working memory and executive attention. Here is another study providing addition support for the first two cortical areas, with an extension to spatial working memory/attention and motor intention.

Click on images to enlarge






- iPost using BlogPress from my Kevin McGrew's iPad

Thursday, June 16, 2011

IAP home office-revised

Spent the morning redoing the IAP home office to be more efficient and to provide more work space. All ready to "get r' done". Yep...one can never have enough computers or monitors...only one missing from the picture is my iPhone...which was used to take the picture. Picture does not include at least 3 semi-dead laptops in closet :)

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Video brain training press coverage@TheBrainScience, 6/15/11 5:19 PM

Brain Science (@TheBrainScience)
6/15/11 5:19 PM
Training via Video Game Shown to Boost Kids' Brain Power http://sns.mx/Yzdky5


Sent from Kevin McGrew's iPad
Kevin McGrew, PhD
Educational Psychologist

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Friday, June 03, 2011

National Academies Press PDF Books Free to Download



To view this email as a web page, go here.

The National Academies Press
June 3, 2011
Subscribe to RSS Follow NAP on TwitterFollow NAP on Facebook Forward this to a Friend

Dear Subscriber,

As of June 2, 2011, all PDF versions of books published by the National Academies Press (NAP) will be downloadable free of charge to anyone. This includes our current catalog of more than 4,000 books plus future reports published by NAP.*

Free access to our online content supports the mission of NAP--publisher for the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council--to improve government decision making and public policy, increase public education and understanding, and promote the acquisition and dissemination of knowledge in matters involving science, engineering, technology, and health. In 1994, we began offering free content online. Before today's announcement, all PDFs were free to download in developing countries, and 65 percent of them were available for free to any user.

Like no other organization, the National Academies can enlist the nation's foremost scientists, engineers, health professionals, and other experts to address the scientific and technical aspects of society's most pressing problems through the authoritative and independent reports published by NAP. We invite you to sign up for MyNAP --a new way for us to deliver free downloads of this content to loyal subscribers like you, to offer you customized communications, and to reward you with exclusive offers and discounts on our printed books.

Sign up now. It's quick, easy, and free.

Sincerely,

Barbara Kline Pope
Executive Director for Communications and The National Academies Press

*There are a small number of reports that never had PDF files and, therefore, are not available for download. In addition, part of the "Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals" series is not available in PDF. Future titles in this series will also not have PDFs associated with them.
Connect with NAP Subscribe to RSS Follow NAP on TwitterJoin NAP on Facebook Forward this to a Friend
Unsubscribe
To unsubscribe from this list please go here or reply to this message with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

To manage your subscriptions and account preferences go here.
Copyright © 2011. National Academies Press.
500 Fifth St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001.
Privacy Statement
The National Academies